Of Horse

Created by Horse enthusiasts for Horse enthusiasts

Get your free account at Of Horse.

  • Vote

    for your favorite new posts
  • Publish

    your own original blog posts
  • Earn

    $15 for your posts voted to Top Posts
  • Sign Up!
Training Methods pt. 5 -The road to success
Facebook Tweet Google+ Pinterest Email More Sharing Options

Training Methods pt. 5 -The road to success

In today's post I would like to return to our original question, which I posed in my first article: "Which training style is more effective? Conventional or Natural horsemanship?"

A quick note:  The last several articles I have written considering training methods are the foundation I am basing the rest of these blogs upon, so if you are new to this series I heartily recommend you begin Here in order that you might benefit the greatest from what I am sharing. For those who have been following these posts, I wish to apologize for not being punctual in publishing this next installment on training methods.

So, which training style is more effective?

In order to properly answer this I must first address and dispel preconceived notions of both.

A lot of people attach a certain air of cruelty or abuse to either of these names, but we must stop this train of thought immediately. Abusive training is simply abusive training. Whether it fell under the name of "natural" horsemanship or a more conventional title it is a slur to either style's reputation –but it does not mean that is the method's principle as a whole.

Let me give you an example: Imagine two individuals each had their own vehicle –one owned a Ford, the other a Chevy. Now, one individual took careful and attentive care to his vehicle, changing the oil frequently, regular tune-ups, and changed the tires when they showed signs of wear. It is no question this person's vehicle would run in a reliable fashion and the car's performance would be very similar to the manufacturer's claims.

But the second individual was particularly neglectful or even abusive with the handling of his car –he never changed the oil, didn't change the tires until they blew, drove in a hard and reckless fashion, did not wash it or add radiator fluid, etc. When this vehicle broke-down or performed in a less than satisfactory way, he might blame its manufacturer and develop a negative opinion towards that model of car in general.

All his friends might believe from then on that Fords were terrible cars whose reliability was to be feared. They may look at that individual who drove a Chevy, and seeing the car's pristine condition and glorious performance become convinced you must drive a Chevy if you ever wanted reliability. But it is easy for us to see his opinion could never accurately represent Ford vehicles as a whole, because he treated his vehicle in a way that it never should have been treated. Any vehicle that received that treatment would end up with a similar fate –not just a Ford.

In this same way there is an unfortunate amount of individuals in the world of horsemanship who will implement and even market a certain style or method of training yet do not actually represent the method correctly or in its entirety. If they abuse its principals and do not train their animal in a manner that looks out for the wellbeing of themselves, their animal, and others, people may see this and want no part of the method they represent or condone. Professional trainers are not excluded from this.

This said, I want to bring up another perspective that is also frequently overlooked. Each individual, when they are learning any particular method, should be encouraged to use parts of a method that they have found beneficial to themselves and their animals –that is not wrong, nor is it a slur upon that method.

Taking something and making it your own –using it in a way that best suits you and your horse as an individual- should never be seen in a bad light, BUT, it must be done with wisdom and caution. If something goes wrong, ask yourself what might have happened uniquely to your situation –do not blame the method as a whole because it was not used as a whole.

Think of a trainer you admire. Can you think of anyone who has become certified to train with their method, or anyone they learned from before they become a trainer themselves? Though the root of the implemented training method is the same, the application will always be different from one person to another –however subtle.

I point this out not to be highlighting individual's imperfections, but to show you that this is a liberty that should be encouraged instead of looked down upon. Since no one will ever be able to perfect and replicate a particular method in its entirety, implementing a training style should be done in a way that will make each individual's unique qualities grow –not hinder them.  This point is of critical importance to consider for your horses.

Methods were designed as guidelines, a basis that we can build a safe, happy, and healthy relationship with our horses off of, but I think too easily we forget that and adopt the fear that if it is not followed to perfection it will be a failure on our part.

Yet if several people were traveling to the same destination but each took different routes, would it be considered a failure on their part for not choosing a single road? What if they took the same route but drove in different lanes? Training methods are our road to success with horses, why should we look down upon others for taking the freeway, or others for the scenic route? Or for one person to drive closer to the shoulder instead of the absolute center of the road?

This freedom in no way excuses abusive or dangerous training practices -individuals who utilize such methods have no place working with animals.  But, it does give people the choice to find what works best for their individual needs -and that of their horses.

This freedom to choose what best suits each individual, their horse, and their ultimate goals is what makes training horses so enriching to our lives. So if one individual prefers a certain discipline or training method over yours, instead of seeing the imperfections in their training, use their experiences as an opportunity to enrich your own knowledge and training routine. The beauty of variety is that you will see things you never saw with your own method, and it will give you a greater understanding of horsemanship as a whole.

In my next several posts I will take a more in depth look at the differences between natural and conventional methods, and how these differences can be better suited for certain individuals (and their horses) than others.

Questions or comments?  I'd love to hear from you!

You can read the rest of this series here-

Part 1, How training methods affect the relationship between horse and rider.

Part 2, The heart of Horsemanship

Part 3, What causes variable results within training methods

Part 4  How tack and housing can affect your horse's potential

Disclaimer: Of Horse! and sponsors do not endorse nor validate the accuracy of a blog post. Each article is the opinion of the blogger.

Yes! Send me a full color horse trailer brochure from Featherlite.

Thanks! Your brochure will be on its way shortly.

Leave a Comment

  1. PonyGirl
    PonyGirl
    As expected, I thoroughly enjoyed your post. I think you're an exceptional writer. You know your subject matter, your explanations are clear and engaging, and you don't come across as lecturing. I think your subject is very timely as well. I'm fairly new to the internet and I was truly appalled at the amount of nit picking, claims of cruelty, and just general negativity in the comments on virtually every picture of a ridden horse on facebook. Or there will be a big debate over whether English or western is the superior discipline. I think it's silly, really. I wouldn't want to jump a fence in a stock saddle, but my pony job would be much more difficult if I had to use an English saddle. I've learned to ride many different styles over the years, and each new discipline I've learned has actually strengthened my ability in my other disciplines, and given me a deeper understanding of how what I do in the saddle affects my horse and why. (Plus it was just so much fun, learning new things!) Any way, great post! I'll be looking forward to the next one.
    Log in to reply.
    1. Barnboot Bailey
      Barnboot Bailey
      Thank you, I'm glad you enjoyed the post! Thanks for reading!
      Log in to reply.
  2. naturegirl
    You make several good points here. I like the way you think - you are taking the eclectic route. This reminds me so much of my psychology classes! Every school of thought in psychology has its advantages and disadvantages, even though most people tend to prefer one philsophy over the others. Voted! When you have the chance, stop by my new piece, Needles and Back Cracking, and vote if you like it!
    Log in to reply.
    1. Barnboot Bailey
      Barnboot Bailey
      Thank you for the encouraging feedback, it is very much appreciated!
      Log in to reply.
  3. arabobsession
    arabobsession
    Have just read all your training posts, very interesting, I am a fan of taking bits and pieces from lots of places, some work, others do not match either my horse or me and sometimes both of us together. Please read my post Finding the right button for you. I have traveled a very interesting, sometimes frustrating, but mostly amazing path with my mare, and it is with thanks to both training methods, and people like you on great sites like this. I am looking forward to your next article.
    Log in to reply.
    1. Barnboot Bailey
      Barnboot Bailey
      Thank you very much for your kind words and encouragement. I am glad you liked my articles. I will definitely read your article -it sounds interesting!
      Log in to reply.

Sign Up to Vote!

10 second sign-up with Facebook or Google

Already a member? Log in to vote.